In a tough economic climate for cinemas and where there is limited public funding, it is important to calculate their economic value more fully and it is incumbent on policymakers responsible for public investment to take note. Cinemas are amongst the most widely accessed and enjoyed cultural venues in the country. Sixty percent of UK adults attended the cinema at least once in 2022, and the phenomenal successes of Barbie and Oppenheimer have shown at times how cinemas play to jam-packed audiences. However, overall attendances have not fully recovered since the pandemic lockdown. Last year’s 117 million admissions were still 33% behind a pre-pandemic 2019 with 176 million admissions.
It is against this backdrop that the Creative PEC and the BFI came together to commission new economic analysis to understand more fully the value of UK cinema venues. The new report ‘Measuring the economic value of cinema venues’ finds that cinema users value their cinema to such an extent that, when hypothetically faced by the scenario that the cinema in question would have to close permanently, they would be willing to pay on average an annual amount of £18 just to ensure its continued existence. Against a backdrop of a cost-of-living crisis this is a striking finding. For the first time, the analysis captures the ‘non-market benefits’ of cinema – the value that cinema users place on cinema venues over and above the value of films they pay to watch. The study uses valuation techniques drawn from public economics, which seek to express value in money-metric terms.
The willingness to pay estimates in the study – undertaken by Ipsos in partnership with Nordicity and the Bennett Institute at Cambridge University – imply that cinemas which align with one of the three groups considered by the study generate at least £600k of additional economic social value a year each, a previously unmeasured economic benefit as valued directly by the public. This is in addition to the £1.18m per year of market value that was already known to be generated per year by a cinema on average through ticket and other sales and memberships, and in addition to the as-yet uncalculated figure of ‘add-on’ economic benefits. The majority of respondents surveyed said they usually eat or drink at a different venue as part of their cinema visit, and 53% said they go shopping as part of a typical cinema trip.
The study focussed on six cinemas in a range of locations, falling into three distinct groups: cinemas that show over 50% non-mainstream films (‘diverse programming’), cinemas in areas which have low cultural offers (‘cold spots’) and cinemas that provide additional experiences e.g. a café/bar/restaurant/workspace (‘social hubs’). Based on a survey of over 2,000 cinema-users they would be willing to pay on average £18 – over twice the cost of an average cinema ticket – in an annual donation just to keep the cinema in question operating.
Cinemas in the UK offer a range of activities in addition to showing mainstream films, including showing independent and world cinema foreign language films. Many provide screenings for specific groups such as older people (eg Silver Screenings), parents (eg Parent and Baby Screenings), people with disabilities (e.g. Autism-friendly, audio description screenings for people who are deaf or experiencing hearing loss), foreign language film interest groups, e.g. Hindi language films, and educational activities. In addition, some cinemas provide community spaces that are part of the cinema for viewing performance (e.g. comedy) or social participation (e.g. film quizzes or open mike nights), or provide spaces to host community activity, e.g. self-help groups, coffee mornings, charity events, or provide places for people to work or study.
Across all cinema venue types, people were willing to pay an annual amount to ensure their continued existence. This demonstrates the huge importance of these cultural and community assets.
The positive and significant willingness-to-pay for ‘cold-spot’ cinemas is extremely important to note; if these cinema venues were to close due to financial pressures it would significantly reduce valuable cultural provision to communities across the UK as well as impacting other local businesses and depleting the attractiveness of that area as a place to live.
Following the 2021 Arts Council England report Culture and High Streets, which found that “Culture is a vital ingredient for successful high streets” and that “cinemas, museums, theatres, libraries, music venues and art galleries all make some people more likely” to visit town centres, the data in this study reinforces the key idea that cinemas can play an important part in revitalising and sustaining our communities, towns and highstreets.
This important, first of its kind study, grows the evidence base on the value of the UK’s cultural and heritage assets. Aside from the obvious challenges in placing monetary values on complex assets such as our theatres, museums and cinemas, a key strength of the economic approach is that it allows the benefits of investment to be compared in the same units as costs. It is not a coincidence therefore that economic valuation techniques, when applied with due care and attention, are accredited by HM Treasury for use in cost-benefit analysis when government departments appraise investment decisions.
The Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre (Creative PEC) is funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.
Download the report: Measuring the economic value of cinema venues
Related Blogs
Creative Corridors: Connecting Clusters to Unleash Potential
Introducing the Creative Corridors framework.
Creative UK Access to Finance Survey: Share Your Views
Professor Hasan Bakhshi, Director Creative PEC and Josh Siepel, Research Lead, R&D, Innovation a…
Unlocking the power and potential of the U.S. creative industries
Cellist Yo-Yo Ma in conversation with Upstart Co-Lab Founding Partner Laura Callanan at “Inves…
Reflecting on a year of State of the Nations reports
We’ve now published a full cycle of our new ‘State of the Nations’ series – which use th…
Copyright protection in AI-generated works: Evolving approaches in the EU and China
Prof Kristofer Erickson discusses the different approaches the EU and China have taken in response t…
Introducing the World Creativity Organization
Edna dos Santos-Duisenberg (member of Creative PEC's Global Creative Economy Council) & Lucas Foster…
Island in Transition: The Journey from Reggae Music Mecca to Creative Economy Hub
Andrea Dempster Chung, Co-founder and executive director of Kingston Creative A blog from Creative P…
UK engagement in Central Asia: Education and the creative economy in the territories of the ‘new Silk Roads’
Dr Martin Smith and Dr Gerald Lidstone look at the history of the British Council's work in Central …
Creative Industries in Egypt: An Overview
Omar Nagati – GCEC Member and Co-Founder of CLUSTER – outlines the findings of a study into the crea…
Introducing the Global Creative Economy Council (GCEC)
Hasan Bakhshi and Rehana Mughal explain what the GCEC is trying to achieve and how the network will …
Global Creative Economy Council: An introduction from the Chair
John Newbigin introduces Creative PEC's Global Creative Economy Council
Creative PEC’s response to the Spring Budget 2024
Creative Industries in the 2024 Spring Budget The creative industries are a significant part of the …
