Arts and cultural institutions must strive to be nimble in a fast-changing funding environment characterised by declining public spending commitments. One of the most difficult challenges is meeting demands to offer funding bodies a tangible, readily quantifiable, justification of their resource allocations in relation to their contribution to society, not least the economy. The concept of ‘value’ has become a keystone of the advocacy efforts advanced by numerous arts and cultural organisations.
One of the most pressing issues for the PEC’s area of work in Arts, Culture and Public Service Broadcasting is value creation, particularly in relation to public funding of the arts and culture, including public service broadcasting. For researchers seeking to contribute to pertinent debates, it is important to find a language to talk about value, one that can help to clarify the policy priorities at stake. Two of the main issues are determining what counts as ‘arts and culture’ (wherein lie their boundaries) and what are the corresponding understandings of ‘value’ in operation. Intertwined are questions of inequality and diversity in participation, production and representation.
Any approach to policymaking in the arts and cultural sectors will recognise that the words ‘arts and culture’ and ‘value’ matter, not least as they inform the frameworks to capture, interpret and explain the evidence gathered by researchers and stakeholders alike. Should arts and culture organisations focus on evaluating individual subjective experiences, for example, or on the societal benefits of their work? If the value of culture is ultimately intangible – as some argue – are all attempts at measuring it futile?
Different renderings of ‘value’ – cultural, social, public and economic – have distinctive histories and uses. Here at the Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre (PEC), we can call on the expertise of a number of instrumental researchers in advancing this field. A helpful overview of the ‘social lives’ of differing understandings of value can be found in the work of Dave O’Brien, for example. The upcoming Histories of Cultural Participation, Value and Governance will include work by our colleague Abigail Gilmore, while Zoe Bulaitis offers a historical overview of cultural value in relation to arts and humanities more broadly.
This area of work within the PEC will build on these varied approaches by adopting a broad definition of value – one that can assist us to move beyond some of the starker polarities of current debates, such as whether economic outcomes should or should not be part of the value creation of publicly funded arts and culture. At the same time, we need to pay particular attention to who is defining and mobilising value and to what effect. While an overview of different meanings of ‘value’ is a useful starting point to explore the policy landscape, it is also important to understand ‘value’ as performative, particularly in its inscription in advocacy efforts and policymaking. This means that rather than trying to secure a definitive statement of what value is, we are interested in tracing what value does.
Publicly funded arts and culture and the creative industries
Relevant policy-making discussions on value in the arts and cultural sector have been influenced by what PEC member Philip Schlesinger from the University of Glasgow has termed the ‘creative economy belief system’, by which policymakers construct the creative industries ‘as a policy object that can be managed to secure primarily economic and sometimes social outcomes so as to increase competitiveness’.
Publicly funded arts and culture organisations tend to frame their priorities in relation to their contribution to broader societal challenges, including where the cultural dimension is overshadowed by other, ostensibly more pressing, funding demands. The value of arts and culture might include – at the individual and societal levels – health and well-being, local regeneration and conflict resolution, but more longitudinal studies are needed.
Under the auspices of the Industrial Strategy, researching the value creation of the creative industries remains a challenge, particularly where publicly funded institutions are concerned. One of the reasons is the emphasis in Industrial Strategy on economic value above others. Organised around four Grand Challenges in areas of strategic importance to Britain, the Industrial Strategy builds on implicit notions of social and public value. The challenges include ‘clean growth’ – creating, for example, low-carbon exemplars by reducing emissions in industrial clusters – and meeting the needs of an ‘ageing society,’ such as those related to healthier ageing and tackling social isolation.
That said, Front and Centre – Putting Social Value at the Heart of Inclusive Growth (May 2019) recommends specifically including ‘social value’ in the Industrial Strategy. By doing so, the government would signal their willingness to lead in the implementation of The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, which places equal importance on social, economic and environmental well-being. This addition would also help redress the fact that the Industrial Strategy does not contemplate tackling socio-economic and regional inequalities, which are all central to the prospect of (local) inclusive growth. The Creative Industries Sector Deal is equally missing a specific articulation of social value, but it places an important emphasis on diversity and inclusion in relation to the composition of the workforce.
The PEC has an opportunity to contribute to efforts to elaborate further these lines of thinking by drawing on the expertise of the consortium and of its academic and industry partners, as well as by collaborating with other institutions such as the Centre for Cultural Value, in order to offer new insights into the specific nexus of economic and other perspectives on value. We can build on the overlapping concepts of ‘cultural’, ‘social’, ‘economic’ and ‘public’ value in order to study the arts and culture sectors within the research we are undertaking into the creative industries more broadly. How we are doing this will be the focus of our next blogs. Stay tuned!
This blog is written by the PEC team researching Arts, Culture and Public Service Broadcasting @CardiffJomec. All correspondence related to this can be directed to the blog’s lead author Dr Eva Nieto McAvoy at firstname.lastname@example.org
The PEC's blog provides a platform for independent, evidence-based views. All blogs are published to further debate, and may be polemical. The views expressed are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent views of the PEC or its partner organisations.